Subscribe to the
weekly newsletter

Peer Review Has Some Problems - but the Science Community Is Working on It

15.07.2018

Scholarly Publishing Is Broken. Here’s How to Fix It

04.07.2018

10 Considerations for Open Peer Review

04.07.2018

Peer Review is Not Scientific

02.07.2018

A New Twist on Peer Review

30.06.2018

Peer Review: eLife Trials a New Approach

27.06.2018

Some Science Journals That Claim to Peer Review Papers Do Not Do So

21.06.2018

Editors of Major Political Science Journals Demonstrate No Systematic Bias Against Female Authors

14.06.2018

Introducing Metadata for Peer Review

06.06.2018

Signing My Peer Review - Unintended Consequences and Gender

06.06.2018

No Race or Gender Bias in a Randomized Experiment of NIH R01 Grant Reviews

01.06.2018

What Motivates Reviewers? An Experiment in Economics

31.05.2018

Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review

28.05.2018

When Will Peer Reviewers Finally Get Paid?

23.05.2018

We Must Demand Evidence of Peer Review

21.05.2018

Beyond Impact Factors: An Academy of Management Report on Measuring Scholarly Impact

17.05.2018

Evidence of Gender Bias Found in Peer Review

01.05.2018

Advocating for Publishing Peer Review

30.04.2018

Peer Review: Correspondence by Relationship at the Royal Society

19.04.2018

Open Peer Review: Bringing Transparency, Accountability, and Inclusivity to the Peer Review Process

17.04.2018
Subscribe to News